Students unions across England have been protesting since the fee increases were announced with the first official NUS demo taking place back on November 10th. The news channels went all out with the coverage and what started out as a valid protest, unfortunately turned violent towards the end which was not the intention of the students union. The chaos was directed at the headquarters for the Tory party (Millbank Tower) and MI6. Students were subjected to being hit by batons and kettling techniques (I learnt a new term, although kettles do eventually boil so maybe not such a good use of word). Thinking about it if kettling is used to contain protesters whilst baton’s are used to disperse crowds... erm, well is anyone else seeing a problem here? Surely using both techniques on the same crowd at the same is a pointless exercise as neither method is working successfully.
Friday, 10 December 2010
NUS protests against tuition fees
Students unions across England have been protesting since the fee increases were announced with the first official NUS demo taking place back on November 10th. The news channels went all out with the coverage and what started out as a valid protest, unfortunately turned violent towards the end which was not the intention of the students union. The chaos was directed at the headquarters for the Tory party (Millbank Tower) and MI6. Students were subjected to being hit by batons and kettling techniques (I learnt a new term, although kettles do eventually boil so maybe not such a good use of word). Thinking about it if kettling is used to contain protesters whilst baton’s are used to disperse crowds... erm, well is anyone else seeing a problem here? Surely using both techniques on the same crowd at the same is a pointless exercise as neither method is working successfully.
Wednesday, 27 January 2010
MIMIT Evening
Thursday, 17 December 2009
Graduation day
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
The last login


Wednesday, 4 November 2009
Medicine and Health Conference
In terms of the oral presentations on the day, despite being on the clinical team, I enjoyed all of them equally. More to the point I understood most of them but whilst talking to people during breaks I was surprised at how many people were confused by say the lab based talks. A bit worrying seen as the room was full of medics or medical researchers. Actually to be honest, towards the end of the day I started drifted off a little bit on certain topics such as genetics – something you do need to be alert for. I did feel bad about it but to fair it had been a long day. Another thing that surprised me was that this conference was suppose to be a way for the junior medics/researchers to get some conference practice and therefore it was very informal to put everyone as ease. Some audience members however took the whole thing very seriously and completely laid into the presenters during question time. I felt this was very unfair as it was hardly helping to build up their confidence. Other conferences in the future will be much tougher and more critical of their work which is why this conference was meant to be an ‘easy one’ – one where they could get some practice and gain some confidence. So I say shame on the meaner audience members.
Anyway to conclude, we had to pick three posters/ talks each for the prize session at the end. Below is a selection of the topics that I found interesting and voted for as the best in my opinion.
POSTERS:
1) Gwen Powel – “Lives not worth living”: an exploration of how healthcare professionals make decisions about serious handicap. #3
A model that describes how medics make life and death decisions. Very intesreting talk by the researcher.
2) Jayne Hutchinson – Do women who take supplements have a greater risk of cancer? #23 *
Clear easy to follow poster and an interesting hypothesis.
3) Nicola Kingswell – Mend your own teeth. #32 *
Development of a protein paint that can applied to a patients tooth which in turn stimulates replacement/growth and the build of healthy enamel.
TALKS:
1) Juile Burke – Injectable, biomimetic self-assembling peptides for skeletal tissue engineering. #7 *
A fun, lively and engaging talk on some very promising research.
2) Huiru Zou – Switching on dental pulp stem cells to rebuild teeth. #12 *
Using pulp cells to rebuild teeth naturally.
3) Yamuna Mohanram – Can dental pulp stromal cells repair bone under favourable microenvironments? #13
Using the pulp cells to stimulate and provide material for the growth of other bones.
All in all an interesting conference where much was learnt, well for me anyway.
* Indicates some of actual prize winners on the day. And yes the dentistry group are a pretty sly bunch :P
And so it begins...





Email 1:
We now have over 80 members, and are excited about the events to come! Which brings me to item 2: our next event, a Speed Dating/Meeting evening on 15 October. Come along to have a drink, and meet other postgrads for a quick flirt or friendly chat...Email 2:
We're getting a hot reply for the speed-dating, which is excellent, and thanks to everyone who has gotten back to us so far. I don't want to alarm the girls, but the RSVP count is unfairly balanced towards the fairer sex. So guys, the girls are up for it: what say you?...
Email 3:
Our next event, the Speed Dating/Meeting, will be held tomorrow, Thursday 15 Oct, at the Faversham Pub (on the rear side of campus), at 7pm until 10pm. Those of you who RSVPed before Monday will be given priority for the speed dating, but anyone else who would like to can (and should!) still come along for a drink just to meet others.
I know societies are pretty eager about keeping everyone well informed but it seems kind of pushy seen as I got the aforementioned emails (as well as few extra ones!) within a relatively short space of time. Also the excerpt from email 2, did make me laugh – “I don't want to alarm the girls, but the RSVP count is unfairly balanced towards the fairer sex”... Yea I totally believe that the organiser was having a minor panic attack when they realised that, lol. And just in case you're wondering - No I did not go ;)

Leeds university logo changes –
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
Dementia


Neurological disorders including dementia are set to rise in the future due to an ageing population.
The type of dementia is dependent on the pathophysiology. The different forms can be dependent on;
- Age (often the same illness can be given different names as they arise in different age groups)
- Gender (some types of dementia seem to be higher in women than in men)
- Pathology (the change in size and shape of the cells i.e. plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, lesions and the location of the changed area i.e. frontal lobe, temporal lobe.
Consequently the pathology in turn determines the symptoms that characterise the illness.
Diagnosis:
When a person is suffering from dementia, the clinician will usually take a clinical history to see if there is a familial link within the family. This will involve enquiring about the patient’s diet, sleep patterns, medications and a history recent illnesses such as stroke, heart disease, cholesterol, blood pressure and diabetes. A mini-mental state examination (MMSE) is also carried out to test the level of cognitive impairment in combination with other clinical diagnostic tests.
It is common practice to also conduct psychological tests and blood tests to exclude other possible causes. The clinical tests may involve scans and neuroimaging techniques (MRI, CAT) as well as an electroencephalography (EEG), analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), tissue biopsies, genetic testing. When all other possible clinical causes have been eliminated then further testing of the cognitive domain is conducted to determine the type of dementia.
There are a number of different scales and assessment methods used to test the cognitive domain however used on their own they are not sufficient, as there is large variation between guidelines and thus the potential for misdiagnosis is possible. Often the histological examination of the brain post mortem is used confirm the diagnosis.
Treatment:
Something to bear in mind is that certain types of dementia are multifactorial meaning that they have numerous causes. For this section if we look specifically at Alzheimer’s and the treatments associated with this disease.
Prevention:
Prevention is the best course of treatment and a number of risk factors have been identified for Alzheimer’s disease;
- A diet that is healthy, low fat, rich in B vitamins and avoidance of alcohol and smoking
- Cognitive fitness - maintaining intellectual and physical activity is a protective risk factor against cognitive decline
- Reducing cardiovascular risk factors is beneficial i.e. hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia, dietary saturate fats, cholesterol, antioxidants,diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease.
- the presence of the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene has been identified as a strong genetic risk factor
Pharmaceutiacal:
Although there is no actual cure as this moment in time, there drugs avaliable to help alleviate the symptoms.
- Cardiovascular risk factors can be controlled by the use of antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin to decrease platelet aggregation and statins such as Atorvastatin to reduce serum cholesterol.
- The use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as galantamine, donepezil and rivastigmine. It is thought that the degradation of acetylcholine is a contributing factor and so these drugs slow down the degradation, allowing levels to remain elevated and prevent further neuronal damage.
- Other drugs include the regulation of neurotransmitters using glutamate, NSAIDS and statins.
- Pharmaceutical intervention such as antidepressants, neuroleptics and mood-stabilizers help alleviate the behavioral changes.
The future:
There are numerous groups working on different theories and possible treatments; selections of which are described below.
- Improvements in diagnostic criteria to allow earlier detection thus leading to more positive outcomes.
- Numerous pharmaceutical drugs such as Protollin, Dimebon, Rember are currently undergoing clinical trials.
- Recent work at the University of Manchester has shown that the herpes simplex virus (usually found in cold sores) may be linked to the build of plaques associated with Alzheimer’s. If this is the case then anti viral agents may be used to treat Alzheimer’s.
- To reduced the levels of amyloid protein that cause plaques by using immunotherapy or the development of a vaccine.
- Using the brain’s own neuroprotective strategies to protect against possible causes such as stroke. This novel approach is called ischemic ‘postconditioning’ that involves the activation of the protein kinase Akt, may go onto to produce a suitable treatment.
- the role of metals such as aluminium and spices such as tumeric have also been highlighted in recent work.
This I feel is a great idea because for the sufferers it is a way to maintain their intellectual ability as I mentioned before and for the carers it is a way to release some of those feelings of frustration and helplessness. The fact that their journals are online mean that anyone can read them and know that they are not alone with this illness, that they have someone to share their thoughts and feelings with. Personally from the patients that I've seen that is one of the key things; the fear/feeling of isolation and to alleviate some of those fears can only be a positive step forward.
Monday, 14 September 2009
Err, the IP belongs to me? No?
i) Your must agree to assign Intellectual Property arising from the projects to the University. Full details of this are explained in the assignment letter (see below).
I cannot be bothered copying the rather wordy and legal sounding assignment letter. Sorry! But I mean really? My intellect or more specifically the intellectual property that I may or may not develop does NOT belong to me? I really don’t get some type of ownership over this? Oh no wait I do... just a passing comment perhaps, but mostly it’s all the university. Which in fairness is ok I guess, seen as they are paying for me via my scholarship. It just feels a bit weird that’s all.
ii) During the tenure of the studentship you may undertake teaching and demonstrating duties in the university provided that the total demand made on your time, including preparation time, does not exceed six hours in any one week. You may not, however, retain or accept other employment or an appointment, which involves substantial calls upon your time without written consent of the Head of the School in which you are registered.
Ok, SO maybe I’m making it sound a bit scary as it is not all harsh and I will learn a lot from some really knowledgeable people. Also I got a really lovely accompanying letter of which included; congratulating me on getting the studentship (Why, thank you), the faculty hoped that I would accept the offer (which I have done) and wished that my time at the university is rewarding and enjoyable (well I hope so too).
Anyhow I now have two whole weeks off. Neither Saba or I have had much of a break this year so these two weeks really mean a lot to us. Eid is coming up and I have a lot of things to sort out before the new university semester begins again. Two whole weeks!!! Woohoo!!!
Saturday, 12 September 2009
My Dissertation...
Title: “Investigation of combined cerebral oximetry and transcranial Doppler cerebral blood flow measurements in the common dementias.”
Location: The University of Manchester (course admin) and Wythenshawe hospital later renamed University Hospital South Manchester (study location).
Area: Department of Academic Surgery and the Vascular Studies Unit (VSU) at UHSM.
Duration: The MSc officially ran from September 2008 and September 2009. This time period also included my clinical study.
Supervisor: Dr Maureen Thorniley
Other people of interest: Numerous helpful associates but a few that I’d like to mention are Professor C. McCollum (Head of academic surgery), Dr V. Sekar (PhD Student), Dr Z. Bashir (Post doc), Miss J. Mercer (Researcher), Mr T. Kelly (Student), Mrs S. Cooper (MSc course administrator), Dr J. Oldham and Dr P. Gardener (Course directors) and finally C. Slinger, D. Anglin and E. Greenwood (fellow 2009 scholarship students).

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) – Measures the cerebral circulation parameters such as speed, direction, resistance, presence of emboli and so on. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) was the prefered vessel for insonation.
Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) – Measures the levels of oxygenation in the cerebral circulation.
Cambridge (CANTAB) – A total of 22 computerised cognitive tests that focus on different areas of the brain and aid in the diagnosis of different neurological conditions.
Mini-mental state examinations (MMSE) – A quick cognitive test (usually under 5 minutes) used to test the mental acuity of an individual.
CAMCOG/ CAMDEX – Other types of cognitive testing procedures commonly used in patient assessments.
Atorvastatin – Medication; statin used to break down plaques in arteries used formed from cholesterol.
Clopidogrel – Medication; anticoagulant used to disperse blot clots.
Hypothesis:
Premise – The process of embolisation is thought to be an early indicator for the onset of dementia. Tiny atherosclerotic plaques give rise to tiny break off particles (named emboli) which travel around in the cerebral circulation. In some cases, these tiny emboli can become lodged in narrow vessels thus decreasing the blood flow and oxygen to certain areas. The decline in cerebral parameters is thought to contribute to the memory decline associated with dementia.
Aims and Objectives – Based on the above hypothesis my project had a number of aims and objectives to fulfil, which were as follows;
- 1st – To screen patients and if they were emboli positive, then the participants underwent further testing where cerebral oxygenation levels (NIRS) and blood flow velocities (TCD) were analysed to see if there was a change in parameters associated with the presence of emboli.
- 2nd – Compare the cerebral parameters of the patients with dementia in the study to normal healthy volunteers of a similar age to see if there were any significant differences between the two groups, which may help to answer some of the questions linked to this area.
- 3rd – To evaluate potential therapies for dementia by analysing TCD and NIRS parameters on a monthly basis. Prior to this the patients were randomised to receive each of the following drug phases, Atorvastatin, Clopidogrel or a no treatment phase.
Methods:
My study had two protocols:
Protocol 1 – Testing normal subjects and patients with dementia.
The aim was to recruit 20 normal and 20 patients with dementia. We ended up with a total of 43 participants - 23 normal subjects and 20 patients with dementia. Both groups of participants (normal and dementia) underwent just a single test session with identical testing procedures. The session involved using TCD and NIRS probes to measure the cerebral parameters whilst the participants underwent the CANTAB test method followed by the MMSE and a full medical history. The results from both groups were analysed to see if any differences could be detected. From all the participants tested, 10 normal subjects were age and sex matched to 10 of the patients with dementia and their results were analysed in greater detail to see if age and gender had any affect on the cerebral circulation. The pictures below show the typical output from each of the methods used (TCD, NIRS, CANTAB).



Protocol 2 – Patients analysed from the drug trial.
These patients were selected from an ongoing clinical trial. 10 patients that had completed the trial in full had their results analysed. Each participant underwent a screening test to see if they were emboli positive of negative, If emboli positive, the participants were randomised to receive the different medications on a monthly basis followed by a month long ‘washout’ period between each drug. At the end of each month (and thus at the end of each different drug phase), the participants underwent 2 x one hour long TCD sessions. Each scan last one hour and each phase requires two scans therefore a minimum of 6 scans per person. A total of 10 patients equals a minimum of 60 scans. These 10 patients also had a monthly MMSE test and a blood sample that was analysed for Interleukin 10, an inflammatory marker.
Results and conclusion: Papers are being written for publication so I will post the link online soon.

Taken by one of the VSU staff. Me working through about a 100 scans (Protocol 1 – 43 scans and protocol 2 – minimum of 60 scans. I look cheerful don’t I?
Further work: Things I would further like to investigate (provided I had the funding and time) would be...
1) Larger patient numbers to increase the validity of my results
2) Validation of CANTAB tests to form part of a diagnostic method
3) Assessment of other neurological defects such as Parkinson’s using the CANTAB method
4) Comparison of other cognitive assessments such as the MMSE, CAM ICU and so on
All in all I enjoyed my project immensely. It was a lot of hard work, long nights and I often felt like packing it all in but I guess I have a strong stubborn streak. And I’m grateful it kicked in because it gave me the fantastic opportunity to learn many things about life in the medical world. Aside from the science/ clinical aspect of the project, from my placement I also learnt many other non-medical stuff.
Two major learning points for me were...
1) Patient responsibility – It seems kind of obvious but some people get so caught up in the end result that they forget everything else. It’s essential to keep patients well informed at all times as they often panic and become anxious very quickly. I learnt that theory and practice are very different in real life. It is VERY hard to recruit people as they can often be very sceptical but mostly scared. Sometimes it’s not even the patients but their carers that are reluctant to some extent. I also learnt very quickly that you must always to be very clear with your aims and what you are doing. Furthermore working with vulnerable populations; especially people with dementia that are often scared/confused, requires the utmost care and attention. Old or young, patients need plenty of patience and need to be constantly reassured. Personally I found those who tried to be a friend and not just their doctor/nurse/researcher or whatever were more successful than those who were strict professionals. I’m not saying that the professional boundaries are not required as they are vital working in such an environment and as part of the clinical team we shouldn’t get too attached but at the same time we should try to be a friend as well, as it helps to break down a lot of barriers.
2) Interdisciplinary teams – Communication is key! Bad communication leads to a lot of infighting between staff and placing blame back and forth as I observed in other departments. It’s bad for staff morale and also for junior staff i.e. students such as me etc. Although I didn’t have any clashes myself – it did show me that sometimes medicine isn’t always about saving lives and includes building on skills that maybe aren’t linked to your scientific and clinical knowledge. Those experiences help make you a good all rounder. I’m sure that all teams go through a few rocky patches but unless they work through it, they’re not doing themselves or their patients any favours. I’m pleased to say that the clinical team I worked with are genuine hard working individuals who are dedicated to their work. I couldn’t have asked for a better place to learn :)
So there you have it... the story of my dissertation. Here’s hoping I get good marks for this past year and for my dissertation (iA). The pictures below show the clinic and work areas, my equipment and patients being tested.

MSc stuff...
Disclaimer – I apologise in advance if anyone dies of boredom reading this post. It wasn’t my intention ;)
My dissertation - for which I will hopefully get a decent mark (iA)
Friday, 11 September 2009
DONE!!!

And I’m finally heading back to Leeds where I belong!
A friend’s sent me a T-shirt which summed up the past year of my life –
... funny I know :) Please feel free to order it from here if you really want to own one :)
So on Thursday night with my dissertation completed to my satisfaction, printed and nicely bound, I thought I could afford to relax a little the night before my submission deadline. TEDx Leeds on a Thursday evening with my cousins. Ok maybe a little geeky but I was genuinely looking forward to it. I should have been there... but instead I spent the evening surrounded by blank CD's waiting to be filled with study data and statistical analysis spreadsheets. I guess archiving my study data took much longer than I had expected. A little disappointed with not being able to go but at least I had the satisfaction of knowing that work wise everything was done properly.
I thought about the families that had lost loved ones and what their lives must be like and whilst everyone else got up and went about their day; I remained seated on the cold stone steps. For some reason, I felt incredibly bad that I had forgotten and part of me couldn’t understand why. I wasn’t personally connected to any of the 9/11 victims so why this sudden guilt? And then it hit me. Whilst I was going about my daily life, doing what needed to be done, how easy had it been for me to forget those we had lost? I don’t just mean the people associated with this day, but people closer to home - our own loved ones, our family and friends. If I could forget this day that was incredibly well documented and talked about, how easy would it be for me to forgot those people that I love who are no longer in this world. Those people that aren’t well known to the rest of the world but for me they hold a special place in my heart.
In all honesty that scared me; that I may one day forget and I made a promise to myself that I would try and avoid that all costs. However this past year at the hospital has taught me that sometimes it is out of our control. The patients with dementia had no idea that they would be struck down by this terrible illness and in essence they have been stripped of their memories. It has made me appreciate life a lot more and I learnt (from my own patients in fact) that we should cherish every moment as we never know when we may lose it all. And so I believe I owe it to those that have gone; to keep their memory alive. Some people might say that it is unwillingness on my part to let go of the past, which they may deem as unhealthy. However I see it differently. It is those losses that have made me who I am today and taught me some invaluable life lessons. To forget those people would be an ungrateful act on my behalf.
Friday, 21 August 2009
It’s getting there...
- Clinic – done.
- Data collection – done.
- Patient and GP follow up – done.
- Statistical analysis - nearly done. Would have been done earlier if I had stopped making changes from numerous suggestions.
- Reading – being continued.
- Writing up dissertation – slowly but surely getting there. Numerous drafts done so far.
Phew! I cannot wait to hand in my completed dissertation, here’s hoping I will get a good mark (iA).
Following the submission of my work, I have two/three whole weeks off before I go back to university for the start of the next semester. Here’s hoping we have good weather during my time off as my holidays were practically non-existent this year. These past few months, I’ve twittering about my dissertation progress during the final months of my MSc. Rather weirdly I got a tweet from a company offering to analyse my data and write up my dissertation on my behalf. All I have to do is send them the university guidelines, my word limit, how I would like it set out and a copy of all my data collected and so on. Helpful it may be but I didn’t take them up on it as; firstly I wouldn’t have spent any time and effort spent on it and so calling it my work would have been an unfair representation. Consequently the final marks would not have been a true reflection of MY work and in my academic/ professional life to date I’ve have never knowingly submitted something that hasn’t been my own work. Secondly I have major issues about plagiarism – handing over unpublished work to an unknown party (and sometimes even known parties) who may or may not be connected to your work is NOT a particularly smart move. I’m pretty sure most of you will probably say that I’m being paranoid but in my mind it’s better to be safe than sorry.
Aah yes so far then – Independence days for Pakistan and India (14th and 15th respectively), Ali Zafar got married but I’m over it, lol (see cool but bordering on weird here) and probably the most major news the month of fasting (Ramzan) will soon be upon us and I’m in two minds about the whole thing. I will further explain this in a separate post later. Hopefully. Actually to be honest I haven’t had much time to catch up on a lot of news which is probably why I’ve been using twitter a fair bit these past few months. Twitter trend topics is good for catching up on general ‘need to know’ news – however I have a problem with this. I often find that trending topics is just a bunch of people tweeting to find out what it is going on and NOT actually informing me of why it all started in the first place. Not very helpful – maybe they should get someone to put up a little intro for each the current trending topics perhaps? Ok, maybe it’s just me then...
Must get back to some work now...
Saturday, 1 August 2009
Clinical mistakes
1) Never argue with a patient. It makes you look very unprofessional plus the patient will think you are an arse no matter how sick they may be. It’s true.
2) Don’t annoy the staff. As a medic try not to annoy everyone else you will have to work with whether it is the nurses, technicians, care workers etc. However if you love making your life as difficult as possible then please fire away with the disrespect!
3) Puctuality. Try and show up on time for shifts/appointments etc. If you’re running late let them know as you are being unprofessional and uncourteous otherwise. Also don’t try to lie about why you are late, because a medic, people will look towards you for trust and honesty. Those same people can also tell when you are lying and totally see through your BS. Result - congrats on making a bad impression.
4) Laziness. Clearly if you’ve made it this far, there must be some hope. Don’t rely on other to do things for you, instead get stuck in and do it yourself. You learn quicker and earn the respect of others around you. By being a slacker, you do the complete opposite and all that time studying in med school goes to waste.
5) Suck up. In the medical world, you respect your seniors; it’s an unwritten rule and there is a hierarchy that is followed and goes something like this... (top) Consultant > SHO > HO > F1> Med student (bottom). To move up this chain, a lot of people suck up to seniors. I get it, I get; it has to be done, but must you do it so blatantly? Urgh!
6) Communication. Not telling other team members (doctor’s/nurses etc) what you have found can lead to problems for the patient and for yourself. If you spot something serious or haven’t relayed vital information back to the appropriate people, then it can lead to some serious hassles.
7) Correct authorisation. Don’t attempt to do things that you have not been assigned or allowed to do. It may cause problems for the patients (legal issues?!) but it will also without a doubt cause problems between you with your supervisor.
8) Fudging it. Don’t make stuff up because it fits in with your study hypothesis or because you forgot to take a patient observation and you need to make up for lost time. Again it makes you look unreliable and incompetent.
9) Know your surroundings. A hospital is a place full of ill people. Obvious I know but when you spend so much time in one place, it easy to forget sometimes. This also applies to your appearance; dress appropriately and smartly – we’re no longer in lecture halls but actually interacting with real patients. Play you part accordingly.
10) Err....
Unfortunately I don’t have a number 10 at this moment in time, but if you think of anymore then please feel free to add them on.
Friday, 17 July 2009
Science debate – economic benefit 17th July 2009
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
Medicine takes over EVERYTHING...
Don’t get me wrong – being involved in medicine (whether as a doctor, nurse, clinical scientist/researcher or any other profession allied to medicine) is rewarding. As medical students we’ve been chosen out of many thousands of applicants to pursue these careers; it is a privilege and we should appreciate it. In accepting our places, it is no longer just a case of getting good grades as there are many more things that need to be considered. We agreed to be put in positions of trust, to improve other people’s quality of life, the responsibility to humanity – all in all a great honour. So yes it is rewarding and I am appreciative... but at the same time it can sometimes be very stressful. Often patients don’t consent to procedures or treatments as they may be nervous or scared and so it sometimes falls to the med students/doctors to be cruel to be kind. It’s funny how repeating a common procedure can still make you feel like a newbie each time. Sometimes it’s not even the clinical setting that is the cause for concern; it’s your personal life. You find yourself reading science journals as opposed to general newspapers or gossip magazines in your spare time, you correct people by providing scientific explanations, you link certain occurrences back to science in a general conversation between friends and the list goes on.
Joking aside though I recently I found myself getting so caught up in my clinical project that it started to take over my whole life. Eventually my project supervisor had to pull me aside and told me to “take some time out and relax.” She told me that as fantastic as it was that I was so dedicated to my work, I should actually take the time to just switch off and live my own life. When this was relayed back to a PhD student I was working with, it led to certain clashes. The student felt that I should spend as much time at the hospital as possible as this is what he/she had done during their clinical training and they felt that every student after them should do the same too. My supervisor (who had also put in long hours during their clinical training) felt that I should pace myself otherwise I would ‘burn out’ and that wouldn’t be useful to anyone. So the difference in opinions which got me thinking - residents and F1’s have set work limits but do medical students? If you don’t put as many hours in as your fellow colleagues does that indicate that you aren’t as committed? Conversely if you’re working as many hours as you possibly can does that mean you don’t know when to stop and have no clue as to how to obtain a healthy work/life balance?
I’m pleased to say that after a few hiccups, I eventually found my own style of working that seemed to satisfy everyone involved (I think) and didn’t send me over the edge. But this incident was useful as it showed me how work can take over your life without you even realising what has gone on. I think balance is very important. As well as gaining new knowledge and meeting interesting people, it’s important not to get trapped by work. As well as being part of the medical world, you’re still a part of general society just like the people you treat and so you should take the time to break off and relax rather than be blinded by work.